Category Archives: Shepherding

Do you love the church?

Oh, how I love the church! Sure, it’s full of sinful people (of whom I am the chief offender!). But it’s also the beautiful Bride of Christ, full of people who were bought by His precious blood. There’s no greater honor than serving the Lord by loving the church and shepherding His people.

Most Americans (including many professing Christians) have rejected “organized religion” in favor of a more private and personal spiritual journey. To many, the church has become optional at best, and irrelevant or even reviled at worst. Janie B. Cheaney responds by asking:

What exactly is “organized religion,” except code words for Christ’s own church? In the world’s eyes, she’s aging ungracefully: an overdressed dowager with a checkered past, who divides her time between ghastly potluck dinners and awkwardly meddling in people’s private affairs.

When he first came to faith through an enchanted forest of imagination, C.S. Lewis saw the church as a “fussy, time-wasting botheration”: “the bells, the crowds, the umbrellas, the notices, the bustle, the perpetual arranging and organizing.” Over time, he probably saw her differently; it’s certain that Christ does, as a radiant bride adorned for her husband, ordained by the One who calls things that are not as though they were.

…To those who claim to follow Jesus yet remain outside His church, one question: How can you love Christ and despise His body?

If you struggle to love the church; if you find yourself irritated with her; or if you are tempted to give up on her altogether, let me encourage you to meditate on these verses, and cultivate your affections for the church:

Matthew 16:18 “I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.

Ephesians 5:25-27 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her, so that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless.

2 Corinthians 11:2 For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy; for I betrothed you to one husband, so that to Christ I might present you as a pure virgin.

Hebrews 10:24-25 and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near.

Photo credit: KellyB

What’s the best night for a youth ministry??

I’m putting together our youth ministry calendar for the 2008-09 school year, and have a basic question. What’s the best night of the week to even have a youth ministry? It needs to be a time that is convenient both for church families and unchurched youth in the community.

What do you think? What does your church do? What pros and cons have you noticed? Please take my poll below.

Here are some thoughts I’ve come up with:

Sunday – PRO: no school activities to interfere; CON: we currently have a Sunday evening service; families are getting ready for their school and work week.
Monday – CON: it’s the very beginning of the school week.
Tuesday – CON: it’s right in the middle of the school week; lots of sports practices and games.
Wednesday – PRO: this is a common youth group night for churches. CON: we currently have prayer meeting on this night; other local churches already offer a youth group on this night.
Thursday – CON: probably the busiest night of the school week as students prepare for papers, tests, and sports games on Friday.
Friday – PRO: it’s at the beginning of the weekend; students can stay out later. CON: football and basketball games.
Saturday – PRO: we could start a little earlier. CON: this lumps all the church activities together instead of spreading them throughout the week; could prevent students and their families from being rested and prepared for Sunday worship.

Church

I was blown away by the opening sentence in Chapter 7 of The Courage to Be Protestant. David Wells begins, “What someone thinks about the church tells us exactly what that person is thinking about Christianity.” Whoa. Is that true?

Wells is talking about the methods and programs and styles and philosophies of church ministry. But as I read that first statement, I was reminded of the many people who have become disillusioned with the church altogether. Many people have at some point been suffocated by a legalistic church, or felt betrayed by scandal in leadership, or been angered by the constant infighting. Many people have grown busy and tired and just decide to stay home on Sundays. Is it really true that their low view of the church is reflective of a low view of Christianity? Yes, to a large degree, I believe it is. And Wells explains why.

What happens in the churches “tells us how people are thinking about God, how they are relating themselves to the truth of his Word, how they see the world, how they think about human corruption – or if they think about it all all – how they think about the gospel, how they think about the poor and dispossessed, their own generation, affluence, and many other things besides” (p. 209). All of these, says Wells, are evident by how we think about and treat the church.

I think nearly everyone would agree that the church is in bad shape today. It seems like there is more scandal, more compromise, more corruption, and more division, while at the same time, there are fewer attending, fewer being baptized, fewer giving, and fewer serving. Our “public approval ratings” are dismal. From a strictly human perspective, it seems the church is sinking faster than the Titanic. But what is the remedy to all of this? Wells says there are two ways to “rethink” the church. We can either rethink its nature, or rethink its performance.

Many people wrongly devote themselves to rethinking the performance aspect of church ministry. In a desire to help the church become more successful, marketers pour their energy into new business models, new technologies, new marketing techniques, and new polling data that will lend insight into doing church. Emergents, meanwhile, dabble more in the mystical, flirt more with the immoral, and celebrate more what is uncertain.

What we really need to be doing, Wells says, is rethinking the nature of the church. We need to reverse the “middling standard” of letting theology shrink to its lowest common denominator (p. 210). We need to distance ourselves from the worldly elements of the culture (p. 224). We need to restore the centrality of God’s Word in our doctrine and preaching (p. 226), reinstate the proper administration of the sacraments (p. 233), and return to the biblical practice of church discipline (p. 237). These are the distinctives of the Protestant Reformation, and they are still worth defending today.

The wonderful reality of church growth is that humans are not responsible for it. God is. “The church is his creation and only he can grow it. He gives it its qualitative growth inwardly, in terms of character and obedience, and its quantitative growth outwardly in terms of numerical expansion” (p. 243). This is a truly liberating thought! It means that pastors and denominational leaders are not responsible for reinventing the church in order to make it more successful.

What God calls us to do is to think more biblically about the nature of the church, and to let that understanding shape our strategies and methods. The church should be humble. It should be loving. It should be emotional. It should be relevant. But all of this should be governed by a robust biblical theology about the true nature of the church. And this will take courage — the courage to be Protestant.

The need for godly men

Here’s an excellent article on the need for godly men in church ministry. The pastor does not have the influence, the time, the wisdom, or the authority to lead the flock of God alone. He desperately needs godly men of courage and biblical fortitude to stand with him. This is not to undermine the importance of godly women in church (1 Tim. 2:9-12; 5:3-16; Titus 2:3-5), but let’s be honest – God has uniquely appointed men to lead His church.

As Andy Davis says, pastors need “to surround themselves with a group of strong, biblically-astute godly men, to stand with them in the ongoing task of local church reformation…May it please God to raise up scores of modern-day Martin Luthers in local congregations, men with backbones of steel, lion hearts for biblical truth and the tenderness of good shepherds leading lambs. “

Pastors, have you identified, and are you training such men?

Men who are not pastors, are you willing to become this kind of man, who will stand boldly for the truth and help lead God’s church? Your help is needed.

Self

It sounds like Pixar has done it again. Their new animation WALL-E is scheduled to open in theaters tomorrow, and World Magazine writes a very favorable review. From what I understand, the story follows WALL-E, a little trash compactor robot, who discovers a wonder for creation, a love interest in a girl robot name EVE, and a disappointment in human beings. “Because they live to be cared for rather than to care, the few human beings WALL-E meets have become, to use [director Andrew] Stanton’s words, giant babies—literally feeding on milk rather than solid food.”

This picture of a selfish, bloated humanity is not so different from David Well’s description in chapter five of The Courage to Be Protestant. This chapter is simply entitled “Self.” Wells may be a deep thinker, but he sure does seem to like short chapter titles.

First, here is a quick review of the book so far:

  • Chapter one – Over the past 75 years, evangelicalism has divided into three distinct constituencies: classical evangelicals, marketers, and emergents.
  • Chapter two – As churches continue to downplay theology and Bible knowledge, more and more members are developing a consumer-mentality.
  • Chapter three – In contrast to postmodern society which has denied any absolute standard of truth and morality, Christianity is all about truth – both understood and applied.
  • Chapter four – The triune God of the Bible has attributes which make Him both “near” and “distant” from His creation. It is only through God that the universe has meaning and that people have hope; the self cannot bear the weight of being the center of reality.

In chapter five, Wells continues to explore the idea of the “autonomous self” that has replaced God as the center of the universe. He explains that the rugged individualism that always characterized America began to turn inward in the 1960s. By that time, “The self had become the source of all values. The pursuit of the self was what life was all about…Now it is about finding the self for yourself, discovering your inner potential for your own benefit, esteeming your self, and developing new ethical rules that serve the discovery of…the self” (p. 136).

Two illustrations of our self-centeredness are that we have become a very sensitive and litigious nation. Regarding our sensitivity, Wells observes, “From all of this has arisen a busy and very profitable industry of healers, consultants, grief counselors, writers, and various other purveyors of comfort to the fragile and afflicted. In America, we have one-third of the world’s psychiatrists, two psychotherapists for every dentist, and more counselors than librarians” (p. 140). In regard to our litigiousness, Wells notes, “As the sense of responsibility for personal behavior has shrunk, the need for litigation has increased. America has more lawyers than the rest of the world combined” (p. 159). Once again, these statistics confirm the “American paradox” that the author mentioned earlier in the book. “We have unparalleled abundance but, at the same time, are being hollowed out” (p. 67).

There are four areas in which Western civilization has fundamentally changed in our thinking about “self.” First, we now talk about values (what is right for each person) instead of virtues (matters of moral character). Second, we now emphasize personality (appearing good) above character (being good). Third, we now focus on self (how we are each distinct, unique, and special) instead of nature (what is common to all humanity). Fourth, we now experience shame (awkwardness about being discovered) instead of guilt (culpability before God) over our sin.

What’s the solution to all of this? Should Christians contextualize our message into postmodern, self-help dress? No. Churches must not reduce the gospel to a therapeutic, felt-needs oriented message that simply offers a better life and a better you. The gospel will certainly produce that, but we cannot replace the benefits of the gospel with the gospel itself. The gospel says that man has a sin nature and is not essentially innocent (p. 166). The gospel says that sin completely separates us from God and that all of us are in need of reconciliation through Christ (p. 168). The gospel says that faith is not mere intellectual assent to the facts about Jesus, but a radical change in our thinking, values, and behavior.

Wells concludes his chapter with a statement bursting with hope: “The fact that the modern self is empty and disintegrating, that our (post)modern society is fragmented and fragile, presents biblical faith with a truly golden moment. A deep longing exists in our society to see the real thing, to see lives lived out that have authenticity, that have substance. This authenticity, however, has nothing to do with following the broken promises of the self movement, which is now simply bankrupt. It has everything to do with taking our place before a holy God, through Christ, in such a way that his character, as it were, reaches into our lives with both the restraint and direction we need if we are to be restored” (pp. 173-74). May all of us be faithful in boldly speaking and authentically living out the truth of the gospel to a watching world.

For next week, we will read chapter six together on the subject of “Christ.” Please take a moment to leave a comment below and share your reactions to this chapter.